Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 08:57
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are some of the craziest laws around the world?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Similarity in long‑term romantic couples probably matters less than we think - PsyPost
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What are the tools HR recruiters or talent acquisition managers generally use to ease the process?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
I've never read the book. What did Dorian Grey do that was so immoral and sinful?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Another huge U.S. airline faces bankruptcy risk - TheStreet
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.